Headwaters

Streams Monitor: By the Numbers (Winter ’25-’26)

A clear stream flows through a lush green forest and over large river rocks.

82 stream sites in Water Resources Inventory Areas (WRIAs) 7, 8, 9, 10, & 15* were monitored December 2025-February 2026.

Winter 2025-26 sampling dates with temperature and precipitation summaries vs. normal
Sampling Dates
December
8-10, 15
January
13-14, 20
February
10-11, 23

Temperature (vs. normal)

  • Dec: +3.8°F
  • Jan: +1.3°F
  • Feb: +1.2°F
Winter Avg: +2.1°F 8th warmest since 1948

Precipitation (vs. normal)

  • Dec: +2.7″
  • Jan: −1.5″
  • Feb: −0.8″
Winter Total: +0.35″ About normal

Temperature and Precipitation data are from NOAA climate station USW00024233 at SeaTac Airport. Values shown are departures from the 1991–2020 normal.

*King County includes Vashon-Maury Island in WRIA 9 for salmon recovery and nearshore work. For all other purposes, including routine stream monitoring, it is designated as WRIA 15.

Three-panel bar chart of daily air temperature in °F at SeaTac for December, January, and February. Each day's observed temperature range is shown as a dark blue bar overlaid on bands representing the historical normal range (light green), record high range (light pink), and record low range (light purple). December's bars sit broadly above the green normal band, consistent with the +3.8 °F monthly anomaly.
Daily temperature ranges from September through November overlaid on historical daily averages and records.
Three-panel chart for December 2025, January 2026, and February 2026 showing daily observed precipitation as blue bars and record daily precipitation as gray bars. A green line tracks year-to-date cumulative precipitation against a dashed black line for normal YTD. December's cumulative line runs well above normal in the "Above Normal" shaded zone; January and February cumulative lines track below the normal line, with the YTD reset visible at the start of January.
Daily and cumulative precipitation compared to historical records and seasonal norms (Dec–Feb 2025). Note the year-to-date precipitation resets in January.

December brought historic flows. Back-to-back atmospheric rivers delivered over 3 inches of rainfall in the second week, with the month finishing at nearly 7.5 inches total. With warm temperatures, and precipitation that would otherwise fall as snow in the mountains coming down as rain, streamflows rose to exceptionally high levels. More than two-thirds of all gaged sites with at least five years of data set new record weekly average flows during the atmospheric river.

On December 10th, the Skykomish River recorded new high instantaneous and daily average flows. The following day, 88 of 95 monitored sites were in the 90th percentile of all daily flows on record, with the Cedar and Snoqualmie River station at Carnation setting new all-time instantaneous and daily average flow records. Other stations on the Snoqualmie at Fall City and the North and Middle Forks were just shy of flows recorded during the 2009 flood. Records continued to fall in the days afterward, as the Green river reached a new all-time daily average flow record on the 13th. Widespread flooding occurred across all major river basins, with flooding persisting until the end of December.

January and February were considerably drier, running roughly 50% and 60% below normal precipitation, respectively. Streamflows followed suit, with most gaged sites falling into below-normal to much-below-normal percentile classes by mid-winter.

The heavy rainfall and widespread flooding in December drove elevated levels of several water quality parameters across monitored streams. Increased runoff mobilized sediment and bacteria from the landscape, pushing total suspended solids, E. coli, and particulate phosphorus (total phosphorus) concentrations well above historical norms at many sites. Stream temperatures were also notably elevated relative to historical data in December and January, reflecting the influence of the warm front that moved through during the sampling events. The above-normal stream temperatures were associated with depressed dissolved oxygen levels at several sites, as warmer water holds less dissolved oxygen.

As conditions dried through January and February, and bicarbonate-rich groundwater comprised a greater proportion of baseflow, alkalinity and pH rose to higher levels. With less overland flow, nitrogen mobilization from the surrounding landscape (e.g. soils and alder leaf litter) declined, resulting in below-normal nitrate nitrogen and total nitrogen at many sites.

These seasonal patterns were reflected in the frequency of water quality standards exceedances across the winter. December’s storm runoff produced the most widespread water quality standards excursions of the three-month period. Nineteen sites exceeded the E. coli single-sample criterion of 320 CFU/100 mL, and 36 sites failed to meet the geometric mean criterion of 100 CFU/100 mL. Nine sites did not meet dissolved oxygen criteria, including Evans, Mercer Slough, Patterson Creek, Springbrook, Mill, Covington, Rock, and North Fork Issaquah Creek. Springbrook Creek also failed to meet the pH criterion, recording a pH of 6.42 against a standard of 6.5.

Water quality criteria excursions were considerably less widespread in January. Six sites — Evans, Mercer Slough, Springbrook, Rock, Mill, and Yarrow — continued to fall short of dissolved oxygen criteria. Only North Creek exceeded the E. coli single-sample criterion, though six sites failed to meet the geometric mean criterion.

Excursions remained limited in February. Pipers Creek and Lyon Creek exceeded the E. coli single-sample criterion, and Ames Creek recorded a pH of 6.42, falling below the 6.5 standard.

Highlighting King County streams data, this thirteen-panel stacked bar chart, one panel per parameter (Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, pH, Conductivity, Total Alkalinity, Turbidity, Total Suspended Solids, Total Phosphorus, Orthophosphate Phosphorus, Total Nitrogen, Ammonia Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate Nitrogen, and E. coli). Each panel shows December, January, and February bars colored by the proportion of sites in each comparison-to-historic class (Much Below Normal through Much Above Normal). December stands out with widespread Much Above Normal results for Temperature, TSS, Total Phosphorus, Turbidity, and E. coli; January and February shift toward Normal and Below Normal across most parameters, while Total Alkalinity and pH trend Above and Much Above Normal as conditions dry out.
Summary of all parameters from December 2025 through February 2026 compared to historical (last 20 years) concentrations. Results are displayed as the proportion of sites above, below, or approximately normal for each sampling month. “Normal” results are defined as those between the 25th and 75th percentile of the historical range. Results “below” or “above” normal represent data between the lower 10th and 25th or upper 75th and 90th percentiles of historical data, respectively. Results “much below” or “much above” normal represent data below the 10th percentile or above the 90th percentile of historical data, respectively.

Beginning in July 2026, new editions of the Streams Monitor will be published here on our blog. You can find older editions of the Streams Monitor as PDFs in our King County science library.

Join the Streams Monitor email list to be notified of new posts or subscribe to Headwaters to get even more science in your inbox.


About these updates

As part of its routine stream monitoring program, King County monitors water quality at 82 sites within streams in WRIAs 7, 8, 9, 10, and 15.

These newsletter updates serve to:

  • Alert interested parties when the most recent King County routine stream monitoring data are uploaded and publicly available on the Streams Water Quality Monitoring Data Web page.
  • Provide initial quality assurance and control of the routine data by identifying outliers and anomalies relative to historical stream conditions and regional observations.
  • Provide a snapshot narrative of regional stream conditions based on the observed stream quality measurements, stream gage data, and meteorological data. This analysis is not comprehensive and is meant to serve as a starting point.

To provide context and a relative scale, water quality data may be compared to Washington State Water Quality Standards. These comparisons should not be used to determine impairment and are for interpretive purposes only.

About the Washington State Water Quality Standards

  • The Washington State legislature has established water quality standards (WAC 173-201A) for the protection of recreational use and aquatic life.
  • Ecology sets aquatic life criteria for temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, total dissolved gas, turbidity, and toxic chemicals (e.g., metals, polychlorinated biphenyls or PCBs, and pesticides), and recreational use criteria for E. coli.
  • The routine stream water quality data collected by King County allow comparison to these criteria for temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, un-ionized ammonia, and E. coli, with limits varying by designated aquatic life (e.g., salmon spawning and core summer habitat) and recreational uses.