Headwaters

Streams Monitor: By the Numbers (Spring 2026)

A clear stream flows through a lush green forest and over large river rocks.

82 stream sites in Water Resources Inventory Areas (WRIAs) 7, 8, 9, 10, & 15* were monitored March through May 2026.

Winter 2025-26 sampling dates with temperature and precipitation summaries vs. normal
Sampling Dates
March
10-11, 16
April
14-15, 20
May
12-13, 19-20

Temperature (vs. normal)

  • Mar: -1.2°F
  • Apr: +1.1°F
  • May: +0.9°F
Spring Avg: +0.2°F 8th warmest April on record (82 years)

Precipitation (vs. normal)

  • Mar: +2.5″
  • Apr: −0.4″
  • May: −0.7″
Spring Total: +1.40″ 8th wettest March on record (82 years)

Temperature and Precipitation data are from NOAA climate station USW00024233 at SeaTac Airport. Values shown are departures from the 1991–2020 normal.

*King County includes Vashon-Maury Island in WRIA 9 for salmon recovery and nearshore work. For all other purposes, including routine stream monitoring, it is designated as WRIA 15.

Three-panel bar chart of daily air temperature in °F at SeaTac for March, April, and May 2026. Each day's observed temperature range is shown as a dark blue bar overlaid on bands representing the historical normal range (light green), record high range (light red), and record low range (light blue). April and May have many bars above the green normal band, while March hovers around normal.
Daily temperature ranges from March through May 2026 overlaid on historical daily averages and records.
By The Numbers: Streams Data from Spring ‘26
Summary of March–May 2026 Streams Data
82 sites from Water Resources Inventory Areas (WRIAs) 7, 8, 9, 10, & 15  were monitored March through May.








Temperature and Precipitation data are from NOAA climate station USW00024233 at SeaTac Airport. Values shown are departures from the 1991–2020 normal.
 
Daily temperature ranges from March through May 2026 overlaid on historical daily averages and records. 
 
Daily and cumulative precipitation compared to historical records and seasonal norms (March–May 2026). 



Spring held true to the adage, “in like a lion, out like a lamb,” with numerous atmospheric rivers dropping nearly 7 inches of rain during the month of March, more than 2 inches above normal. Streams swelled as a result, with monthly average flows well above normal at many sites. That was especially true toward the Cascade foothills in the eastern part of the county where several sites recorded the highest monthly average flows on record.
In contrast, May saw much drier conditions, with just over 1 inch of precipitation recorded—about 40% below normal. Streamflows responded in kind, with about a quarter of all streams, especially those in the Snoqualmie Valley, averaging flows well below normal.
 
Mean daily streamflow conditions across King County stream gages for March 2026, shown as percentile ranks relative to the full period of record. Only gages with at least 10 years of data are shown. Nearly one third of gages recorded flows in the Much Above Normal (>90th percentile) or High (>99th percentile) range.
 
 
WhereasThough the weather went out like a lamb, water quality went out like a lion toward the end of spring. Water quality standards exceedances were few and far between in March but mounted through May as the season warmed and dried.
March was the eighth wettest on record. The March sampling runs on the 10th and 11th coincided with the arrival of an atmospheric river that saturated the region, resulting in increased runoff and erosion that elevated total suspended solids (TSS) and turbidity across many sites. Between the rain and cooler temperatures at the time of sampling, stream temperatures were broadly slightly below normal. Even so, three sites failed to meet the water quality criterion for dissolved oxygen, including Evans Creek and Mercer Slough in WRIA 8 and Springbrook Creek in WRIA 9.
The rest of spring brought much warmer conditions, with April and May coming in as the eighth and thirteenth warmest on record (of 82 years). Storms during the April sampling (the 14th and 15th) drove increased runoff and elevated fecal bacteria concentrations at several sites. Fifteen sites exceeded the E. coli criterion of 320 CFU/100 mL. Five of those sites exceeded 1,000 CFU/100 mL, including Taylor creek (WRIA 8), Newaukum Creek and two sites on the lower Green River (WRIA 9), and Boise Creek (WRIA 10). A warm front from the 18th through 20th pushed the Seattle Tacoma Airport climate station to a new daily record of 74 degrees F on the 19th. Streams in the Snoqualmie basin (WRIA 7) sampled the next day recorded temperatures well above average.
As May arrived and the region continued to warm, the first temperature water quality criteria exceedances of the year were observed, with 14 sites across WRIAs 7, 8, and 9 exceeding Washington Department of Ecology’s criteria. With warmer water holding less oxygen, 16 sites failed to meet the water quality criterion for dissolved oxygen as well. Along with the warmth, rain was sparse. Nothing over 0.1” fell until the 13th. As groundwater dominated streamflow, alkalinity and conductivity were elevated, setting monthly high records at many sites. Bacteria lingered too—12 sites exceeded the water quality criterion for E. coli, led by Little Soos Creek at 2,300 CFU/100mL and Maplewood Creek at 1,000 CFU/100mL.
 
Summary of all parameters from March through May 2026 compared to historical (last 20 years) concentrations. Results are displayed as the proportion of sites above, below, or approximately normal for each sampling month. “Normal” results are defined as those between the 25th and 75th percentile of the historical range. Results “below” or “above” normal represent data between the lower 10th and 25th or upper 75th and 90th percentiles of historical data, respectively. Results “much below” or “much above” normal represent data below the 10th percentile or above the 90th percentile of historical data, respectively.
 
More streams resources:
•	King County Streams WQI Interactive Dashboard
•	King County Streams Data Explorer
•	Washington Water Quality Standards
Daily and cumulative precipitation compared to historical records and seasonal norms (March–May 2026).

Spring held true to the adage, “in like a lion, out like a lamb,” with numerous atmospheric rivers dropping nearly 7 inches of rain during the month of March, more than 2 inches above normal. Streams swelled as a result, with monthly average flows well above normal at many sites. That was especially true toward the Cascade foothills in the eastern part of the county where several sites recorded the highest monthly average flows on record.

In contrast, May saw much drier conditions, with just over 1 inch of precipitation recorded—about 40% below normal. Streamflows responded in kind, with about a quarter of all streams, especially those in the Snoqualmie Valley, averaging flows well below normal.

Though the weather went out like a lamb, water quality went out like a lion toward the end of spring. Water quality standards exceedances were few and far between in March but mounted through May as the season warmed and dried.

March was the eighth wettest on record. The March sampling runs on the 10th and 11th coincided with the arrival of an atmospheric river that saturated the region, resulting in increased runoff and erosion that elevated total suspended solids (TSS) and turbidity across many sites. Between the rain and cooler temperatures at the time of sampling, stream temperatures were broadly slightly below normal. Even so, three sites failed to meet the water quality criterion for dissolved oxygen, including Evans Creek and Mercer Slough in WRIA 8 and Springbrook Creek in WRIA 9.

The rest of spring brought much warmer conditions, with April and May coming in as the eighth and thirteenth warmest on record (of 82 years). Storms during the April sampling (the 14th and 15th) drove increased runoff and elevated fecal bacteria concentrations at several sites. Fifteen sites exceeded the E. coli criterion of 320 CFU/100 mL. Five of those sites exceeded 1,000 CFU/100 mL, including Taylor creek (WRIA 8), Newaukum Creek and two sites on the lower Green River (WRIA 9), and Boise Creek (WRIA 10). A warm front from the 18th through 20th pushed the Seattle Tacoma Airport[TLJ6]  climate station to a new daily record of 74 degrees F on the 19th. Streams in the Snoqualmie basin (WRIA 7) sampled the next day recorded temperatures well above average.

As May arrived and the region continued to warm, the first temperature water quality criteria exceedances of the year were observed, with 14 sites across WRIAs 7, 8, and 9 exceeding Washington Department of Ecology’s criteria. With warmer water holding less oxygen, 16 sites failed to meet the water quality criterion for dissolved oxygen as well. Along with the warmth, rain was sparse. Nothing over 0.1” fell until the 13th. As groundwater dominated streamflow, alkalinity and conductivity were elevated, setting monthly high records at many sites. Bacteria lingered too—12 sites exceeded the water quality criterion for E. coli, led by Little Soos Creek at 2,300 CFU/100mL and Maplewood Creek at 1,000 CFU/100mL.

Thirteen-panel stacked bar chart, one panel per parameter (Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, pH, Conductivity, Total Alkalinity, Turbidity, Total Suspended Solids, Total Phosphorus, Orthophosphate Phosphorus, Total Nitrogen, Ammonia Nitrogen, Nitrite + Nitrate Nitrogen, and E. coli). Each panel shows March, April, and May bars colored by the proportion of sites in each comparison-to-historical class (Much Below Normal through Much Above Normal). 

May stands out with widespread Much Above Normal results for Temperature, Conductivity, and Total Alkalinity.
Summary of all parameters from March through May 2026 compared to historical (last 20 years) concentrations. Results are displayed as the proportion of sites above, below, or approximately normal for each sampling month. “Normal” results are defined as those between the 25th and 75th percentile of the historical range. Results “below” or “above” normal represent data between the lower 10th and 25th or upper 75th and 90th percentiles of historical data, respectively. Results “much below” or “much above” normal represent data below the 10th percentile or above the 90th percentile of historical data, respectively.

Beginning in July 2026, new editions of the Streams Monitor will be published here on our blog. You can find older editions of the Streams Monitor as PDFs in our King County science library.

Join the Streams Monitor email list to be notified of new posts or subscribe to Headwaters to get even more science in your inbox.


About these updates

As part of its routine stream monitoring program, King County monitors water quality at 82 sites within streams in WRIAs 7, 8, 9, 10, and 15.

These newsletter updates serve to:

  • Alert interested parties when the most recent King County routine stream monitoring data are uploaded and publicly available on the Streams Water Quality Monitoring Data Web page.
  • Provide initial quality assurance and control of the routine data by identifying outliers and anomalies relative to historical stream conditions and regional observations.
  • Provide a snapshot narrative of regional stream conditions based on the observed stream quality measurements, stream gage data, and meteorological data. This analysis is not comprehensive and is meant to serve as a starting point.

To provide context and a relative scale, water quality data may be compared to Washington State Water Quality Standards. These comparisons should not be used to determine impairment and are for interpretive purposes only.

About the Washington State Water Quality Standards

  • The Washington State legislature has established water quality standards (WAC 173-201A) for the protection of recreational use and aquatic life.
  • Ecology sets aquatic life criteria for temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, total dissolved gas, turbidity, and toxic chemicals (e.g., metals, polychlorinated biphenyls or PCBs, and pesticides), and recreational use criteria for E. coli.
  • The routine stream water quality data collected by King County allow comparison to these criteria for temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, un-ionized ammonia, and E. coli, with limits varying by designated aquatic life (e.g., salmon spawning and core summer habitat) and recreational uses.